<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
    <title>Namd Blog</title>
    <description>Research and field notes on getting cited by AI models</description>
    <link>https://namd.tech/blog</link>
    <atom:link href="https://namd.tech/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 18:02:47 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    
    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[What we publish, and why]]></title>
        <description><![CDATA[An independent census found that six of seventy-four tools in this category publish a methodology you can check. Here is ours, in full, including the parts that make us look worse.]]></description>
        <link>https://namd.tech/blog/what-we-publish-and-why</link>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://namd.tech/blog/what-we-publish-and-why</guid>
        <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
        <category>Methodology</category>
        <author>Christer Hagen</author>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Most sites cannot be read by the models answering questions about them]]></title>
        <description><![CDATA[Before you worry about being cited, check whether the crawler gets a page at all. Four failures we find on almost every site we scan, in the order they cost you points.]]></description>
        <link>https://namd.tech/blog/most-sites-cannot-be-read</link>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://namd.tech/blog/most-sites-cannot-be-read</guid>
        <pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
        <category>Research</category>
        <author>Christer Hagen</author>
    </item>
</channel>
</rss>